Scientific America explores why so many of us readily subscribe to conspiracy theories and draw conclusions from questionable patterns. It turns out we prefer type I over type II errors.
When our ancestors still hunted in the woods, it’s better to assume that rattle came from a poisonous snake and run, than to take your chances and get bitten. As a result, natural selection favoured those that assumed all patterns were real.
In other words, evolution hearted paranoia.
[via Freakonomics]
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d8724c13-4452-441e-bfe2-b9dd7a2bef3d)