Image via Wikipedia
The WSJ translation of this Chinese blogger’s review [Chinese] of “Avatar” really doesn’t do it justice.
It’s pretty dry, originally interpretive, and hilariously sincere in embracing a movie previously thought by critics to be about our recurring fantasies around pantheism and racial guilt, into an Avatar with Chinese sentiments.
And the focus is on a subject close and dear to the Chinese heart – real estate.
Temporarily forgetting its own creeping neo-colonialism in certain parts of the world, the Chinese turns domestic, and sees the struggle on Pandora an analogy to Chinese government’s strong hand in evicting residents from their homes to make way for new developments. In the past decades of economic development, this kind of forced eviction benefited mainly real estate developers and local governments officials – many in bed with real estate developers, have left a pretty permanent mark on the Chinese psyche.
Chinese netizens react. Hilarity ensues.
Here are some comments:
Strongly condemn the Western director for using Avatar to allude to China’s current situation!!
Avatar is the story of violent eviction and demolition [of people's homes] in China.
The humans actually failed to successfully evict and demolish [the aliens]? Truly embarrassing. Why didn’t they send China’s chengguan there earlier?
This film is too reactionary, encouraging China’s ordinary common people to use violence to resist demolition!!! [It is an] attempt to subvert the great China!!
“Avatar” shows the director’s deep understanding and concern for the (forceful) eviction and demolition [of people's homes] in China!!
“Avatar”, Chinese name “A Chengguan’s Vindication/Confessions”;
“District 9“, Chinese name “Director of Demolitions”;
“The Matrix”, Chinese name “State Apparatus”
When I first moved to Calgary to work in the oil and gas industry in early 2006, it was right around the top of the property boom, and affordable housing was next to impossible to find. Not wanting to shell out half my salary for an apartment, and spending months to fill it up with furniture, I decided to go the room rental route.
Little did we know at the time, but towards the end of 2006, the market was slowly but surely moving from sellers’ to one that favoured buyers. Ones in the know, i.e. people with family members that dabbled in real estate, already sold in late 2005 or early 2006. But the media and the rest of us general public have always been slow to catch on. And you wouldn’t know, from the construction buzz around the city, to the countless “For Help” signs hanging haplessly outside shop windows, to stories of McDonald’s and Starbucks paying upward of $14 an hour plus benefits to attract and retain employees.
My second landlord, a sweet spinster in her 60s, believed in the power of real estate as much as she believed in the miracle that is modern medicine. She credited her various real estate investments for her comfortable lifestyle, despite not having worked out of her home for more than decade. Her piece of advice to any young-uns that cross her path, is the adage that we should all invest in real estate sooner rather than later. I can’t blame her or others her generation for their spectacular confidence in the strength of the housing market. Their experience of ever-rising property prices facilitated that expectation. It certainly looked good at the time, with housing prices that doubled within a few years. Houses that were hardly 1,000 square feet would go for 400,000 to 500,000 dollars in certain parts of the city. The gains were ludicrous. And the whole town was drunk on the sudden discovery that, thanks to oil sands in their back yards, a lot of them were paper millionaires! Read more...